I have a serious question for all the blogistanis.

I am currently talking to a publisher and some magazines about my writing and am torn between keeping my blog handle ‘Baraka’ and using my birth name.

Although some of my friends and family do read this blog, it is under the condition that they do not share my identity with anyone they pass it on to.

The reasons I like my pen name are four-fold:

1. The meaning of baraka (blessing) is a reminder of the intentionality and awareness that should suffuse my writing and , hopefully, living.
2.My nafs (ego/self) doesn’t need any more attention than I already give it
3. I cherish my privacy
4. I want to maintain a separation between my personal and professional writing. So if a human rights org Googles my name they will come up with a list of my professional papers, but not my personal struggles with illness. (Quite important as far as potential employer discrimination goes.)

However, Basil and GQ both feel pseudonyms come across as highly suspicious, indicating that someone has something to hide, that they’re ashamed of what they’ve written, and that one can become all nafs-y even with an alter ego.

I love writing and am not ashamed of what I write. But if that is the prevailing opinion then maybe I should reconsider. Either way I need to make a decision soon.

I know that there are bloggers who write in the duniya (world) as well as blogistan so I’d love it if you could share some insights on why you chose your name over a nom de plume or vice versa, if you think it’s even possible to maintain that separation after awhile, and anything else you may think is helpful.

Thanks!