The BBC reports that in South Asia, you can now pad the number of attending guests on your way to wedding debt. Er, bliss.
“An agency has been set up in India to rent out guests for couples keen to boost the numbers at their weddings…In the state of Rajasthan weddings are huge family events – so much so that to not have enough guests may be embarrassing as large numbers equate to power & status.
The Best Guests Agency employees can turn up either traditionally dressed or in smart Western clothes, and are briefed on family history and pretend to be friends from the past. Three categories of guests are offered, with the highest – at around 600 rupees – being be-suited guests who are tall, well-built, light-skinned and who can converse well.
Mr Syed, the founder, said that he has been contacted by families from far outside the state, including Bangalore, Calcutta and even Dubai.”
—
In Freeland, people often invite only Very Important People to their wedding due to prohibitive costs. Many parents are leery of putting up cash for starter or multiple marriages as divorce rates soar to 44%. Also, their children are usually older & earning salaries by the time they settle down so more & more are footing the bill for their own weddings. We may be a charge-happy society but at least we only charge that which we can pay off in say, a decade. What better way to enter the marital state than $10,000 in debt after all?
When Basil & I got married in Pureland, we insisted that no more than 150 people be invited, which we thought very generous since we originally wanted to wed barefoot on a beach in Mendocino with no more than 25 people present. My parents were appalled at our sheer naiveté. With 150 guests, they complained, they’d only be able to invite family!
Eventually they stopped consulting us on anything as they realized they were paying for the wedding & thus could do whatever they pleased. My sisters had 500 & 700 guests at their weddings respectively and we eventually topped out at about 300, with all sorts of extra & uninvited characters showing up in the end.
Invites to desi weddings are given to all & sundry as far as I can tell. That medical college roommate your father hasn’t seen or spoken to in 30 years? He must be invited even if he lives in Chicago because if he somehow finds out about it, & realizes he wasn’t invited, he will complain and that two-minute ordeal is unbearable. My father, who drives like an aggressive madman (one hand on the wheel, one on the horn, & both feet on the gas), met some bare acquaintances at the Islamabad Club shortly before my wedding who had the gall to complain that they hadn’t been invited, & before my outraged eyes, he meekly issued them an invite.
It’s bad enough being at a wedding, this time your own, where you do not know 90% of the people attending, but it’s even worse when you realize that even your parents don’t know a good percentage of them. Suffice to say, I have many, many photos of me in a flaming red bridal gown smiling plastically with strangers.
Free food is a big part of it. You must invite each & every person you know, or brushed past in the market this morning, because otherwise they will whinge about it. But really what they are whinging about is missing out on a free meal. The way some people act at weddings you’d think they’d never seen a buffet before - literally elbowing each other out of the way, spilling food on their clothes in their eagerness to shove it in their mouth, & being totally unwilling to move away from the buffet table once they’ve filled their plate to let others eat because they want to stay close for seconds & thirds. Once, I even saw otherwise sane, professional, educated people throwing well-gnawed chicken bones over their shoulders & onto the carpeted floor before diving headfirst into the biryani yet again.
Plus, all those random people who invited you to their kids’ weddings where you then had to cough up cash as their salaami (present) must now be invited so they can in return cough up cash for your kids. Fair’s fair, after all. And, trust me, people remember how much you gave. I was once at a wedding where the bride’s sister yoinked the discreet envelopes stuffed with cash that guests were handing the couple, opened them before the guests had left the stage, rifled through the notes (glaring if necessary at any miserly guests), & finally noted down the name & amount in a handy dandy notebook that just happened to match her sari. As a backup, it’s also all on video, with a suitable filmi soundtrack.
So, people remember, but they don’t necessarily adjust for inflation. The Pak rupee was 15 to the US dollar when we moved there in 1985, so getting 500 rupees ($33) back then was a big deal in a country where the per capita income is still only $183/month as of 2004. The rupee is around 60 to a dollar now, but from the looks of it, for some people the 80s never ended.
In Pureland for many years the government actually outlawed the serving of food at wedding receptions because people were competing with each other to stage such lavish receptions that it was becoming well-nigh impossible for even the middle class to marry off their children without going into catastrophic debt because of raised cultural expectations.
As usual in Pureland, many people just worked around the law. They hosted dinners at home for selected guests, or in extreme cases, handed them gift certificates to restaurants, & even passed out gold coins to make up for it. Gee, wish I’d been invited to that wedding.
Seriously though, the fact that it has become a matter of izzat (honor) to feed portly folk a heavily meat-based dinner so that they can celebrate the wedding of your child by gaining a few pounds is utterly incredible. Feeding the hungry, I totally commend. But hardly anyone is interested in this Sunnah because they’re too busy tripping over themselves in their haste to impress the Joneses. Or the Khans, as the case may be.
(Speaking of meaty meals: There seems to be a direct correlation between how highly one honors a guest & the size & number of animals slaughtered for that guest’s meal. If you’re served one chicken, you’re as yummy & special as lentils. Which means not very. Mutton? Now we’re talking.)
Hotels made up for their lost revenue due to the law by charging an arm & a leg for serving guests tea & soft drinks with nary a dry cake russ in sight. My poor parents. They were dishing out hefty, inflation-adjusted salaami, sipping watery tea, & dreaming of the day when their three daughters would wed & they could, in sweet serenity, legally offer everyone flat Fanta…but when that time finally came round for the last two daughters, the restrictions had been lifted. So, now, if you don’t put on a lavish feast (no vegetarian food please, we’re Pakistani), people will…well, people will talk.
And we can’t have that, now can we?






15 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 18, 2005 at 5:51 pm
Aisha
I had 200 at my wedding, referred to as the “small wedding” but most of the people were friends and family. I hated the thought of people attending simply for free food and a chance to gossip without a care about the couple or family involved. My mom still laments “x, y, and z” who didn’t get invited and really should have. Ah well:)
The whole izzat thing is so ridiculous. I know my cousins in Pakistan when they get married we’re gong to have to help fund their weddings. It’s such an issue that some people DONT get married because of the expense the wedding will be. I mean it’s prety sad that Pakistan had to jump in and like a parent say “if you’re going to behave this way trying outdo each other, no more dinners for you”
Is that you and hubbs? Nice picture of whoever it may be!
September 18, 2005 at 9:33 pm
The Sane One
I’ve seen people doing the note-taking too, it’s so disgutsing and unislamic – a gift should be given and recieved by sincere and open hearts!
I think smaller weddings are better – then it is about you and your family [and the hubby's]. Not what the Khan’s expect you to do and have.
September 19, 2005 at 12:55 am
raven
Imagine how many guests you would have had if husband’s family were in Pakistan too!
I think we had about 150-200, mainly because the bride was the only one from her side
September 19, 2005 at 4:42 am
Baraka
Salaams all,
Aisha, I completely agree with the small wedding concept. Had we done it our way it would have been very intimate but my parents live in Pakistan & felt it was important to show everyone that the weren’t uncomfortable with the fact that R is American, for one. Thus they wanted to do a big wedding like they did for my sisters.
Personally, I would have been happy with a nikah at home with close family & friends instead of the admittedly lavish & beautiful hotel reception, but I eventually left it up to them as they have to live & negotiate within that society.
And I think it’s sickening that people just cannot afford to get married in so many Muslim countries now. We’re shooting our future in the foot & putting incredible pressure on people.
Sane One, it’s not the dollar amount, it’s the du’a that counts. *sigh* Why have we forgotten that?!
Raven, we had a Boston reception since only 4 people from the US made it to Islamabad to attend the wedding (due to the stupid State Dept warnings for US citizens to avoid Pak like the plague) & it was a delightful & manageable 80 people, mostly his & his parents friends.
How did your wife enjoy the celebration? R loved everything except the golden turban
Warmly,
B
September 19, 2005 at 6:02 am
Basil
Personally, I find the whole “must invite everyone or they’ll be upset” to be sad, and somewhat offensive. People have to get over the fact that the world doesn’t revolve around them, and that there may be a few helpings of chicken tikka to which they are not welcome.
I feel so bad for people who are guilted into extending an invitation, whether it be by family, friend, or acquaintence. It’s not fair, and it’s not decent. I also believe that so long as hosts give-in to this social pressure that the practice will continue.
Of course, having not lived in a society governed by gossip and personal connections, I realize that it may not be so easy to just tell the greedy, selfish mob to go blow it out their…noses. If you, or any member of your family ever pains someone about not inviting you/them to a wedding, SHAME ON YOU. Grow up, and just remember that the marriage is for the couple, not the guests!
September 19, 2005 at 1:02 pm
Dawn
wow your husband is so brave!
September 19, 2005 at 2:14 pm
otowi
marriages shouldn’t be expensive – all that money could be put to sooooo much better use. I’d rather have a wedding that cost $100 for paperwork than an expensive one. If I want to invite some people for a nice dinner, then I could see that as being “ok” but not an extravagant dinner.
I think it is terrible, unIslamic, but people are put in so much pressure to do it.
September 19, 2005 at 5:17 pm
Tigerlily
It’s a wonder you didn’t elope to Vegas….!
September 19, 2005 at 5:29 pm
Cella
where did you find that photograph of such astonishingly photogenic people?
September 19, 2005 at 7:54 pm
Baraka
Salaams all,
Dawn–I think we’re *both* brave to have survived the multi-day madness of a desi wedding
Otwoi–Yep. I think that money can be better spent by setting up the couple in financial security for one, and ultimately our Sunnah is for simplicity, which got lost somewhere along the way.
TL–We were pretty close to eloping but when familial duty calls…we also ended up having a private intimate beach ceremony eventually for just the two of us to satisfy that craving, so that was wonderful!
Basil – Sing it, baby.
Cella – Amazing what’s available out there on the web, eh?
Warmly,
B
September 22, 2005 at 3:25 am
Salacious Samosa
p.S: is that you and your husband?
September 22, 2005 at 1:58 pm
raven
We had another wedding in Rhode Island (nobody from the US made it to Karachi – except us, of course
There were about 90 guests; mostly my wife’s parents’ crowd plus all our friends from around here.
She had a great time in Karachi! Didn’t get tummy sick or anything.
Hey so here’s a personal q – feel free to ignore it. Did your husband have to convert to get married or does he just happen to be a true believer?
September 22, 2005 at 5:42 pm
Baraka
Salaams Raven,
R spent about 6 months studying Islam & felt very strongly that he could not convert to a religion unless he did it sincerely. So, although I don’t know if he would have studied Islam per se had we not met, he did make an informed decision on that.
Neither of us would have been comfortable with a conversion of convenience, though that is what most people on both sides thought it was – until he started practicing & working at an Islamic institute.
I think as a convert he knows waaay more than I do as a born-lapsed-now practicing Muslim!
Warmly,
Baraka
January 23, 2007 at 10:08 pm
Anonymous
Good content and very informativity! Thanks!
August 12, 2008 at 12:18 am
Rent-a-Guest « other|matters
[...] posted at Rickshaw Diaries, September 2005, and reposted here in honor of my upcoming 6th wedding anniversary, [...]